AmpliTech Group Announces Closing of $1.4 Million Registered Direct Offering5 slots meaning 。

KROGER have been slammed after a customer bought a "poor quality" product and were forced to make last minute dinner arrangements. The furious shopper took to social media site X on Tuesday to make the complaint, labelling the product as "ridiculous". A customer took a picture of the beef they had purchased before writing their post. They said: "This is the second time in the last month. "Another last minute dinner change of plans because of poor quality Kroger products. "This is Kroger's 80/20 3lb rolls of beef, ridiculous. read more in money "Yes it's like that all the way through." The image shows the beef to be made up predominantly of vile gristle and fat. One commenter pointed out: "That doesn't look like beef to me!!" Kroger responded to the complaint, saying: "Hi, there! Thanks for reaching out. Most read in Money "Please feel free to send us a private message so we can further assist you. Have a great day!" It is not known if the shopper has had their complaint properly addressed by Kroger. KROGER COMPLAINTS This is not the only time recently in which Kroger has come under fire from its customers online. A shopper has also taken to X to rant about a poor experience with the chain. On 5 December X user John posted: "@kroger literally I ordered groceries last night, paid for them, had them delivered today, and before delivery the price went up? "I got charged again today because the price went up before delivery happened? "That's called fraud. I agreed to pay the price on my receipt." Kroger responded: "Hello John. We're sorry to know about this. "This is not the experience we want for our customers. "Kindly call us at 1-800-576-4377 or send us a DM with your shopper's card number, name, and email address so we can make things right. Kroger shoppers can return items with or without a receipt. All Kroger Co. Family of Stores can accept returns of items purchased at any location within 30 days of purchase. Returns with receipts: Customers can use digital or paper receipts to get a refund The refund will be returned in the same payment method the purchase was made. Either going back on a card or handed back in cash Returns without receipts: Customers wanting to return more than $10 will receive a store merchandise gift card for the value Customers who spent less than $10 will receive cash "Looking forward to hearing from you." On November 29 , an angry shopper took to the social media p-platform X to complain about the supermarket always being out of the items they need. This forces them to go to other places when they are in need of a few bits. The post read: "Every single time I go there they are always out of something I need, so I end up driving 3x as far to Walmart . "I just ran to Kroger for two items, and they are out of both. From now on I'm just going to Walmart." Kroger replied: "Hi! Thank you for bringing this to our attention. "We Suggest you sending us private message to provide you with the best assistance, Thank you. Looking forward to hearing from you." Read More on The US Sun The customer was quick to hit back at the response, saying that it was pointless, and not completely their fault. He wrote: "Why bother? I have been assured the issues are on the distribution side. Stores order product that doesn't show up." Senators Elizabeth Warren and Bob Casey asked the CEO of Kroger to answer eleven questions about AI, labels, and Microsoft's EDGE technology: How many Kroger grocery stores currently use EDGE or other ESL platforms? How many customers are served by these stores? Did any external entities advise Kroger to adopt EDGE and/or continue using EDGE? If yes, who are those external entities? Has Kroger prepared internal estimates regarding the potential to increase prices or profit margins by adopting dynamic pricing with EDGE? How does Kroger establish dynamic prices using the EDGE system? What factors does Kroger consider when changing prices? Please include a description of any time- or volume-based considerations. How does Kroger inform customers of recent or upcoming price changes? How far in advance does Kroger inform customers of price increases that will be implemented using the EDGE system? For all items that have been subject to dynamic pricing using EDGE, what is the average percentage change in price of those items over the first six months of using the system? For what percentage of items has the price increased over the first six months of using the system? Has Kroger ever used EDGE to change the price of an item more than one time within the same day? If not, does Kroger intend to do so in the future? If yes, please list: The locations at which Kroger has changed the price of an item more than once in a day. The complete list of products for which Kroger has changed the price more than once in a day. Will Kroger use customers’ data to institute personalized pricing on its ESL platforms? Will customers have the option to opt out of the collection of personal data through ESL platforms? What safeguards has Kroger put in place to protect against violations of consumer privacy related to ESL platforms? How will Kroger ensure that it will not use customer data related to ESL platforms to discriminate based on protected classes, such as race, gender, or age, when offering personalized prices? The senators requested that Kroger answer these questions by August 20. Source: Letter from Sens. Warren and CaseyInsurgents reach gates of Syria’s capital, threatening to upend decades of Assad rule

Trump and Macron can’t let go of their handshake duelDeepinder Goyal co-founded Zomato in 2008, and has transformed the company into the country's major online food-delivery platform, with a market cap of Rs 2.78 lakh crore. Published: December 22, 2024 7:49 PM IST By Deepinder Goyal, the co-founder and CEO of popular food delivery platform, Zomato, has been ranked 2nd on the Hurun India’s top 200 self-made entrepreneurs list. Goyal, 41, who has a net worth of $1.8 billion (Rs 15, 284 crore), became a billionaire after Zomato’s shares saw a significant rise in July this year, and the company valuation surged by a whopping 190 percent, to Rs 2,51,900 crore. Who is Deepinder Goyal? An Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Delhi alumnus, Deepinder Goyal co-founded Zomato in 2008, and has transformed the company into the country’s major online food-delivery platform, with a market cap of Rs 2.78 lakh crore. Over the years, Zomato has expanded its presence to other countries through strategic acquisitions, such as Cibando in Italy and Gastronauci in Poland. In 2022, Zomato ventured into the quick-commerce platform space by acquiring Blinkit, previously known as Grofers, to take on its competitors Swiggy’s Instamart, Zepto, among others. Apart from successful foray in the the quick-commerce sector, Zomato also operates HyperPure, a B2B platform which sells spices, fruits, vegetables and dairy products to hotels, restaurants and caterers. Deepinder Goyal married his first Kanchan Joshi, the couple fell in love while studying at IIT Delhi, but the marriage fell apart, ultimately ending in a divorce. Later, Deepinder Goyal net worth According to Forbes, Deepinder Goyal has a net worth of $1.8 billion as of December 22, 2024. The 41-year-old Zomato CEO sits on the second spot on Hurun India top 200 self-made entrepreneurs list, thanks largely to the rapid rise witnessed by his company since July this year. Hurun India top 200 self-made entrepreneurs Deepinder Goyal is followed by Swiggy founders Sriharsha Majety and Nandan Reddy, while at just 21 years of age, Zepto co-founder, Kaivalya Vohra, is the youngest on the Hurun India list of self-made entrepreneurs, Radhakishan Damani, the 69-year-old CEO and founder of Avenue Supermarts (DMart), who boasts a $16.5 billion, retained his top spot on Hurun India’s list For breaking news and live news updates, like us on or follow us on and . Read more on Latest on . Topics

Is Free Fire Finally Coming Back To India In 2025? What Does The Latest Leak SaysFederal appeals court upholds law requiring sale or ban of TikTok in the US AP Updated: December 6th, 2024, 23:49 IST in Business , Home News , International 0 Pic courtesy: gbnews.com Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on WhatsApp Share on Linkedin New York: A federal appeals court panel Friday unanimously upheld a law that could lead to a ban on TikTok in a few short months, handing a resounding defeat to the popular social media platform as it fights for its survival in the US. The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied TikTok’s petition to overturn the law — which requires TikTok to break ties with its China-based parent company ByteDance or be banned by mid-January — and rebuffed the company’s challenge of the statute, which it argued had ran afoul of the First Amendment. Also Read Maruti Suzuki, Mahindra to hike vehicle prices from January 4 hours ago Foreign Secretary Misri to visit Bangladesh Dec 9: MEA 5 hours ago “The First Amendment exists to protect free speech in the United States,” said the court’s opinion, which was written by Judge Douglas Ginsburg. “Here the Government acted solely to protect that freedom from a foreign adversary nation and to limit that adversary’s ability to gather data on people in the United States.” TikTok and ByteDance — another plaintiff in the lawsuit — are expected to appeal to the Supreme Court, though its unclear whether the court will take up the case. “The Supreme Court has an established historical record of protecting Americans’ right to free speech, and we expect they will do just that on this important constitutional issue,” TikTok spokesperson Michael Hughes said in a statement. “Unfortunately, the TikTok ban was conceived and pushed through based upon inaccurate, flawed and hypothetical information, resulting in outright censorship of the American people,” Hughes said. Unless stopped, he argued the statute “will silence the voices of over 170 million Americans here in the US and around the world on January 19th, 2025.” Though the case is squarely in the court system, its also possible the two companies might be thrown some sort of a lifeline by President-elect Donald Trump, who tried to ban TikTok during his first term but said during the presidential campaign that he is now against such action. The law, signed by President Joe Biden in April, was the culmination of a years-long saga in Washington over the short-form video-sharing app, which the government sees as a national security threat due to its connections to China. The US has said it’s concerned about TikTok collecting vast swaths of user data, including sensitive information on viewing habits, that could fall into the hands of the Chinese government through coercion. Officials have also warned the proprietary algorithm that fuels what users see on the app is vulnerable to manipulation by Chinese authorities, who can use it to shape content on the platform in a way that’s difficult to detect — a concern mirrored by the European Union on Friday as it scrutinises the video-sharing app’s role in the Romanian elections. TikTok, which sued the government over the law in May, has long denied it could be used by Beijing to spy on or manipulate Americans. Its attorneys have accurately pointed out that the US hasn’t provided evidence to show that the company handed over user data to the Chinese government, or manipulated content for Beijing’s benefit in the US. They have also argued the law is predicated on future risks, which the Department of Justice has emphasised pointing in part to unspecified action it claims the two companies have taken in the past due to demands from the Chinese government. Friday’s ruling came after the appeals court panel, composed of two Republican and one Democrat appointed judges, heard oral arguments in September. In the hearing, which lasted more than two hours, the panel appeared to grapple with how TikTok’s foreign ownership affects its rights under the Constitution and how far the government could go to curtail potential influence from abroad on a foreign-owned platform. On Friday, all three of them denied TikTok’s petition. In the court’s ruling, Ginsburg, a Republican appointee, rejected TikTok’s main legal arguments against the law, including that the statute was an unlawful bill of attainder or a taking of property in violation of the Fifth Amendment. He also said the law did not violate the First Amendment because the government is not looking to “suppress content or require a certain mix of content” on TikTok. “Content on the platform could in principle remain unchanged after divestiture, and people in the United States would remain free to read and share as much PRC propaganda (or any other content) as they desire on TikTok or any other platform of their choosing,” Ginsburg wrote, using the abbreviation for the People’s Republic of China. Judge Sri Srinivasan, the chief judge on the court, issued a concurring opinion. TikTok’s lawsuit was consolidated with a second legal challenge brought by several content creators – for which the company is covering legal costs – as well as a third one filed on behalf of conservative creators who work with a nonprofit called BASED Politics Inc. Other organisations, including the Knight First Amendment Institute, had also filed amicus briefs supporting TikTok. “This is a deeply misguided ruling that reads important First Amendment precedents too narrowly and gives the government sweeping power to restrict Americans’ access to information, ideas, and media from abroad,” said Jameel Jaffer, the executive director of the organisation. “We hope that the appeals court’s ruling won’t be the last word.” To assuage concerns about the company’s owners, TikTok says it has invested more than USD 2 billion to bolster protections around US user data. The company has also argued the government’s broader concerns could have been resolved in a draft agreement it provided the Biden administration more than two years ago during talks between the two sides. It has blamed the government for walking away from further negotiations on the agreement, which the Justice Department argues is insufficient. Attorneys for the two companies have claimed it’s impossible to divest the platform commercially and technologically. They also say any sale of TikTok without the coveted algorithm – the platform’s secret sauce that Chinese authorities would likely block under any divesture plan – would turn the US version of TikTok into an island disconnected from other global content. Still, some investors, including Trump’s former Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and billionaire Frank McCourt, have expressed interest in purchasing the platform. Both men said earlier this year that they were launching a consortium to purchase TikTok’s US business. This week, a spokesperson for McCourt’s Project Liberty initiative, which aims to protect online privacy, said unnamed participants in their bid have made informal commitments of more than USD 20 billion in capital. AP Tags: TikTok US Share Tweet Send Share Suggest A Correction Enter your email to get our daily news in your inbox. Leave this field empty if you're human:

ST Picks: Caring for caregivers - A lifeline for self-care and supportMiddle East latest: Israeli strikes kill a hospital director in Lebanon and wound 9 medics in Gaza